I've read the 16 chapter of John before but never saw it in this light. What a blessing. Interaction like that make me want to read and know more. Blessings 🙌🏻

@k J I can feel you were happy and singing and listening when you wrote it 🙌🏻 Bless you..

Yeah but it doesn't seem natural.

Indeed me too, is a blessed 🎶🎶

Amen beautiful song. I listen to it a lot in the music place

It sure brings in more people and fill the seats, but I just think at what point does the church loose its identity to be like the world

Hmm interesting point

There should be a distinction between the two. Choir practice is not the same as the choreographed dance that has been widely accepted by Christians lately as a means of worship. If the choir rehearses, or practice, it is the means of preparation for coming into the presence of the Lord. It will be the same as leaving a crowded room for a quiet place to pray and seek the Lord. However, here is the difference between a choir rehearsing and those that engage in choreograph dance as a means of worship. A dance is the expression of gratitude sincerely from the heart, shown without. If a person must practice to show that they are thankful to the Lord, then he or she hasn’t really felt anything to be thankful for. They instead are mimicking the reaction of a feeling that should be natural, but for the lack of it, they choreograph, or strategize their expression. Does this imply choreograph dance is wrong? Absolutely not, if it is done right for an entertainment purpose, it is pleasing to the sight. However, for a Christian to be thankful to the Lord, it is not for an entertainment, but the gratitude that we feel, we express. Some raise their hands, some pivot, others clap their hands and motion their heads. Others dance, but they dance because they are thankful, but not through a strategy to entertain. If the Church strategized to entertain men through their choreography dance, who gets the glory? Those that are dancing get the glory. Who are the dancers thankful for? Not God, but they are thankful for those they are entertaining.

One of the many errors of which we will address a few, are as follow: The woman is not to be, nor was she ever meant to be a second-class citizen to society by being in submission. Note, it is to her own husband she submits. The error arises when women are subjected in certain circles to be submissive to all. Herein, you have all men believing they can control any woman. Here is the idea concerning the question. If a man steps up to be a man, by loving his family, protecting his family, by being the head of the family, in essence, he is willing to take full responsibility for the well-being of his family, even if it means putting himself in danger as a shield to protect his family. This is what a true head of the wife is. Like Christ our head, Who gave His life for us that we may live. So then, when such characteristic of a real man as a husband is displayed toward his children and his wife, then it is natural for a wife who loves her husband to submit to him, knowing she can count on him at all times. Regardless of modern ideology wherewith equality is the goal, but it must be achieved through competition between the man and the woman; The greatness of the woman is not when she competes to be like the man. She is great when she is herself. Equality is harmony through the understanding of a structure. The husband and wife who live in faith by trusting in the Lord, the two becomes one, while setting a good example for the children. Therein, the children obey their parents. On the contrary, competition is enacted to validate the acceptance of the one competing. If love doesn’t validate the acceptability between a man and a woman as husband and wife, competing will never suffice, nor satisfy the harmony of love between the husband and wife.

I understand your point, although I can't put my finger on it to say why I think it's wrong.. but personally speaking, it just doesn't sit well with me.

It didn't sit well with me so I had similar conversation with someone about it, but brought out the point about a choir practice rehearsing before they sing, comparing both to be the same.